Seventh Generation Original Soft and Gentle Free and Clear Baby Wipes, 350 Count

Yous know about how individuals gain control of the ability of the State and so abuse that power like former United states President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Republic of iraq which was highly profitable for some United states of america businesses.  He accomplished this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious world security threat when Iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush UK The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley 15 February 2011.

Remember how Bush-league was supported by United kingdom Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which did not be simply which Blair claimed could exist deployed within 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you lot remember that and so you lot will know how these kinds of people dispense the media.  Discover how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin salve us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this solar day.

On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that bluntly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came about every bit a upshot of the interaction of three completely unlike factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living weather condition, specially diet and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to take:

Small Pox – Big Prevarication – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease called smallpox and it did kill people long ago.

This was especially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and high-strung them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London'due south first park congenital later rich feared disease spread from slums UK The Contained By Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The center and upper classes needed to be reassured the State would keep them safety from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The problem was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed equally many or more the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, Britain, USA, Sweden.

Now you tin read a relatively curt just well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its part in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Bloodshed- UK, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs below detect the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished past vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On whatsoever scientific assay of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [encounter table beneath].  Leicester's approach as well cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Menses.	Small-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (Uk)	1860-1908	1,355	96	seven.one
British Army (Bharat)	1860-1908	ii,753	307	eleven.ane
British Ground forces (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.eight
Royal Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	8.0
K Totals and example fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.three
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	five.one

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Nihon, of the British Army, and of the Regal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were nosotros able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would accept soared with a respective effect—but on the opposite side."

Tabular array 29.

Modest-Pox Epidemics, Toll, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-charge per unit Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	nine,659	i,594	16.fifty	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	seven,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£two,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Medico

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching flu season and the enthusiastic calls to utilize the flu vaccine, you lot might exist wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the idea of injecting whole or $.25 of microbes and other substances into people in an try to provide protection against contagious affliction begin?

Many medical and history books present a unproblematic tale of the origin of vaccination. Near nowadays the same basic tale of the brilliant ascertainment of a simple country doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening illness of that time – smallpox, or every bit it was oftentimes chosen the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the writer reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-twelvemonth old male child named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes'south cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps'south hands. The boy came downward with a slight fever, simply aught more. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should take resulted in a total-blown, albeit mild, case of the disease. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once more; again, aught. [1]

Edward Jenner'due south idea eventually became known equally vaccination, which is derived from the Latin discussion for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in identify, smallpox would be tamed and the earth would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is non dissimilar the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly ophidian-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a mortiferous enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in identify, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to support a conventionalities, achieve an iconic status while any unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well earlier the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using pocket-sized amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the artillery of healthy people. This thought was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practice of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do improve against the disease than if they contracted it at some peradventure less desirable fourth dimension and place in the hereafter.

The idea was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. Only considering of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an performance that could only exist afforded by the wealthy.[three] The process did often help protect the individual that was inoculated, just there was still an estimated 2-five% that died equally a consequence.[4,5] Still, this was an comeback compared to a 20-25% mortality charge per unit in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] But, was the difference in mortality due to inoculation alone? Or could it have had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had meliorate access to more than nutritious nutrient and a cleaner surround than the majority of society?

In that location was ane major and mostly unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more than deaths than at that place would take been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious illness and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse issues, because information technology acquired more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation evidently tends to spread the contamination, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would non otherwise have been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a heart of contagion, whence information technology spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contamination are evidently multiplied very greatly past Inoculation . . .[vii]

Nonetheless, while the popularity of variolation varied, the trouble of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had become a very lucrative process it was enthusiastically continued past most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox connected to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our fable. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an eight-yr-erstwhile boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He subsequently deliberately exposed the child to smallpox equally a exam to run across if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did not contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection confronting smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the employ of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be allowed to smallpox, at that place were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, considering they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Dr.-Convivial Lodge, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

Simply he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at information technology. The moo-cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where small-scale-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the offset there were problems with Jenner'south procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested past being inoculated with smallpox to run into if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report only decided to ignore the results because they were non in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was quickly embraced past many in the medical profession equally the answer to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the conventionalities that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to embrace Jenner'south ideas among numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that at that place were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Kid was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the year 1799. A calendar month later on it was inoculated with small-scale-pox matter without effect, and a few months subsequently took confluent pocket-size-pox and died. 2. A woman-servant to Mr. Hazard, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual fashion from milking. Seven years after she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught small-scale-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, 3 years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . thirteen. The child of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. 14. The kid of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's function . . . died of small-pox a twelvemonth later vaccination.[ten]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Notation that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an xviii% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality rate equally smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This loftier fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small Pox, who accept previously undergone Vaccination by the most expert practitioners, is at nowadays alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brownish, a surgeon with thirty years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an commodity discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine do." But later vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, later vaccination, people all the same could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer back up the practice.[xiii]

Similar today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to embrace it as a new form of income. It is therefore quite significant for a physician to take spoken out against it as Dr. Brown did.

Connected observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, two [1820-1822] there was a slap-up hubbub about the pocket-size-pox. It broke out with the great epidemic to the due north . . . Information technology pressed shut to dwelling to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had pocket-size-pox before, and often severely; almost to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, but cruel upon great numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English language pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote nigh the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed past JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the real small-pox afterwards, and accept either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but as failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed dominance, and there were calls to obtain fresh material direct from cows.[sixteen]

While the fable maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the fabric originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was merely smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[18] This faulty belief would consequence in the cosmos of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a homo who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow'southward udder. He and then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A later inquiry determined that this was naught more than than the onetime exercise of smallpox inoculation.[twenty]

Not simply was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but there were besides reports of deaths from other causes shortly after vaccination. For example, a peel status called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful way to die.

. . . a male child from Somers-town, aged 5 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (eight days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged x weeks, and the son of a sugar baker, aged xiii weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the encephalon."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the University at Paris.

Outset I rejected the thought that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more than and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by ways of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At nowadays I do not hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As it became increasingly articulate throughout the 1800s to more than doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to exist, refusals increased. In order to deal with this, the judicial organization intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a prepare of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nix to curb the trouble of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting effectually 1837, at that place were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the great 1872 epidemic. After 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-threescore, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most astringent smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph one). In fact, more people died in the 20 years afterwards the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox bloodshed charge per unit from 1841 to 1880.

By this betoken, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the bulk of the medical profession supported vaccination, in that location were those that spoke out against the process. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent md of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being made past vaccinators. Immense fiscal proceeds combined with the forcefulness of constabulary created the perfect environs that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the nowadays year they will get nearly a quarter million. Other sums, besides, which I cannot name, take been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a dishonest remedy produced so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental command strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A cracking pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French ground forces is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war in that location were twenty-iii thousand four hundred and 60-nine cases of small-pox in that regular army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine thou three hundred and ninety-ii small-pox patients in London hospitals, six 1000 eight hundred and fifty-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than one hundred and 20-ii thousand vaccinated persons take suffered from minor-pox . . . Official returns from Federal republic of germany show that between 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine condom, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal freedom and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine motility. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accustomed imprisonment rather than assuasive vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the great sit-in in Leicester England, in 1885. That same yr Leicester's regime, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to ten%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective ways that eliminated the need for vaccination. However, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination rate would outcome in a terrible "massacre," particularly in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town's residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually exist plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Depression vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[xxx] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall subtract in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that past abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an center-sore to the pro-vaccinists the globe over. Here is a not bad manufacturing boondocks having a population of nearly a quarter of a 1000000, which has demonstrated by a crucial test of an experience extending over a period of more than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to modest-pox and far less afflicted by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than information technology was at a time when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was oftentimes promoted as a safe procedure, it often caused sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox bloodshed rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other furnishings of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the terminate of the 1800s, smallpox inverse its graphic symbol. Subsequently the summer of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its loftier death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the Usa. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed i in 5 of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from 1 in l and later on to as depression as i in 380. The disease could withal impale, but having become so much milder, it was oft mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild blazon of smallpox began to prevail in the Due south and afterward gradually spread over the country. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was unremarkably at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a tabular array showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death charge per unit was around twenty%, as it had been historically. The table also showed that subsequently 1896 the death rate fell off rapidly, starting with 6% in 1897 to as low as 0.26% past 1908. As the mild form of smallpox replaced the classic blazon, smallpox could be hard to tell from chickenpox, which was, past this time, considered a mild illness of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a small communicable disease of childhood, and is importantly important considering it frequently gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s information technology was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced piffling in the mode of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Private cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although at that place has been no protection past vaccination, the class of the disease is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms balmy or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage charge per unit, in that location was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was not a major issue, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the last smallpox decease in the United states in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a skin condition due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to be between 1 in twenty,000 to ane in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to 40%.[35] However, they acknowledged that most cases were not reported and in that location was no accurate accounting on this consequence of vaccination. There were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths equally the effect of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time there had only been 1 smallpox expiry in 1948.[36]

The terminal smallpox death in the United States following an importation occurred in 1948, only since that time there take been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is notwithstanding occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military father after the father was vaccinated. After a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother also required handling and virus was found all over the house.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study idea that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually take been even higher. This report but examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the Us. If the deaths were this high in a country with a modern health-care system, what was the full number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present across the unabridged globe?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has at present inappreciably a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and perhaps afraid that if nosotros did the accident of some future epidemic might put the states in the wrong. We prefer to let compulsory vaccination dice a natural death and are relieved that the full general public is not curious plenty to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination equally most the only medically promoted manner to deal with disease, in that location were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common nutrient production that is made through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. M. Oliphant, K.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the apply of Acerb acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to minor pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more than reliable as a safe in pocket-sized-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed ii tabular array-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic treatment died, while amongst those under ordinary treatment the mortality was equally usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe too demonstrated vinegar's ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective confronting smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar equally a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used 3 or iv times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretarial assistant of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, at present comes to the forepart in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Whatsoever person who has been exposed demand accept no fearfulness of smallpox if he will take 2 or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or iv times a day." The give-and-take may at present be regarded as closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple tree cider vinegar might seem featherbrained, merely only because nearly people have been conditioned to accept the age-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal'southward (usually a cow) abdomen, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and haemorrhage. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or simply an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the germination of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in peel, bones, and blood vessels and also gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate acceptable collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve every bit mortar holding cells together and, equally a result, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King'southward College, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fatty, coffee, and booze while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gilt miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, every bit living almost entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is done down with copious librations of strong coffee, and big quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men existence at the aforementioned time subjected to the nearly intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Blitz of the mid-1800s, an estimated x,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Ceremonious State of war twice every bit many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For instance, the causes of decease listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly deemed for at to the lowest degree two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common cause of expiry, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for just a small-scale fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died as a result of their wounds accounted simply for ane pct of the total deaths.

Other big infectious killers such as scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this fourth dimension to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive pass up of 99% of deaths in whooping coughing and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & 6).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping coughing bloodshed rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a land doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a key medical belief that continues to exist echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. But the truthful history shows u.s.a. a different reality.

The make name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the earth psyche every bit something to protect someone from an affliction. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease affair into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific illness. The reality of vaccination is nothing close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's groovy discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular matter from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more and more vaccines seem like a expert idea to you lot?

More data on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping coughing, and lost remedies can exist found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's volume "Dissolving Illusions" which can exist found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
two.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Wellness, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
iv.Frederick F. Cartwright, Affliction and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present Land of the British Settlements of N-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
half-dozen.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Printing, 2007, p.179.
7."The Exercise of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Mag and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Instance Against Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
nine.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
ten.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Deed of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Periodical and Review, vol. 8, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Nowadays State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Book Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
xiv."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Immature Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
sixteen.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and journal of applied medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Written report on the Product of Vaccine Virus in the United States," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
twenty.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Midweek, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, February 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Pocket-size-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. 19, no. four, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. W. Harman, MD, "A Dr.'due south Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Cursory: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June one, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Apr sixteen, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to exist Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. Due west. Hodge, Doctor, "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. 3, no. 16, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious Disease equally Shown past the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. two, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Manufacturing plant Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Cost Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, West.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Physician and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. ten.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, January 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
xl."Acetic Acid in Red Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January xv, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Periodical of Medicine, vol. Six, no. one, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Wellness. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King'southward College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Do good to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Study of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, regime, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, scientific discipline, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

matthiesthandsoll.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post