Home  ›  when performing triage, what classification should be given to a victim with minor injuries?

when performing triage, what classification should be given to a victim with minor injuries?

Written By Tuesday, April 12, 2022 Add Comment Edit

This commodity is about the concept of triage as it occurs in medical emergencies and disasters. For other uses, see Triage (disambiguation).

Procedure of determining the priority of patients' treatments based on the severity of their condition

External or outside triage in front of a Swedish infirmary during the COVID-xix pandemic aimed at avoiding spread of the infection among patients with other diseases.

In medicine, triage () is a practice invoked when acute care cannot be provided for lack of resources. The procedure rations care towards those who are about in demand of immediate care, and who benefit nigh from it. More than generally information technology refers to prioritisation of medical care every bit a whole. In its acute class it is most often required on the battleground, during a pandemic like COVID-19, or at peacetime when an accident results in a mass prey which swamps nearby healthcare facilities' capacity.

Triage ever follows the modern interpretation of the Hippocratic oath, merely otherwise there is enough of leeway in interpretation, leading to more than than one simultaneous idea of its nature. The best settled theories and practical scoring systems used in here come from the area of acute concrete trauma in an emergency room setting; a broken bone obviously counts for less than uncontrolled arterial bleeding, apt to lead to death. But no electric current principle carries too well over to mental health, reproductive health (such every bit ballgame), chronic medical conditions, elderliness, or palliative care (including euthanasia). This is because triage needs to rest multiple and sometimes contradictory objectives simultaneously, near of them existence fundamental to personhood: likelihood of expiry, efficacy of handling, patients' remaining lifespan, ethics and religion of them all.

In practical Western medicine resources are plentiful and future demand can exist predicted well in advance.

History [edit]

The term comes from the French verb trier, meaning to separate, sort, shift or select.[i]

"Structured triage" was introduced by Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I. It was in his armies that the wounded was beginning categorized and treated according to an order of priority – in times of war, higher priority was given to military personnel over civilians and the higher-ranked over the lower-ranked. The do spread to other armies in the following centuries and coined "triage" by the French.[2] [3]

Modernistic medical triage was invented by Dominique Jean Larrey, a surgeon during the Napoleonic Wars, who "care for[ed] the wounded according to the observed gravity of their injuries and the urgency for medical care, regardless of their rank or nationality",[4] though the full general concept of prioritizing past prognosis is foreshadowed in a 17th-century BCE Egyptian document.[5] Triage was used further during World War I past French doctors treating the battlefield wounded at the aid stations behind the forepart. Those responsible for the removal of the wounded from a battlefield or their intendance after would divide the victims into three categories:[half dozen] [seven]

  • Those who are likely to live, regardless of what intendance they receive;
  • Those who are unlikely to alive, regardless of what intendance they receive;
  • Those for whom immediate care may make a positive departure in outcome.

For many emergency medical services (EMS) systems, a similar model may sometimes even so be applied. In the earliest stages of an incident, such as when ane or two paramedics exist to twenty or more than patients, practicality demands that the in a higher place, more than "primitive" model will be used. Nonetheless, in one case a total response has occurred and many hands are available, paramedics will usually employ the model included in their service policy and standing orders.

As medical technology has advanced, so have modern approaches to triage, which are increasingly based on scientific models. The categorizations of the victims are frequently the result of triage scores based on specific physiological cess findings. Some models, such every bit the Beginning model may be algorithm-based. As triage concepts go more sophisticated, and to improve patient safety and quality of care, several human-in-the-loop determination-support tools take been designed on top of triage systems to standardize and automate the triage process (e.k. eCTAS, NHS 111) in both hospitals and the field.[8] Moreover, the recent evolution of new machine learning methods offers the possibility to acquire optimal triage policies from information and in time could replace or amend upon practiced-crafted models.[9]

Concepts in triage [edit]

Simple triage [edit]

Simple triage is unremarkably used in a scene of an accident or "mass-prey incident" (MCI), in order to sort patients into those who demand critical attention and immediate transport to the hospital and those with less serious injuries. This step tin exist started before transportation becomes available.

Upon completion of the initial assessment by physicians, nurses or paramedical personnel, each patient may exist labelled which may identify the patient, brandish assessment findings, and identify the priority of the patient'due south need for medical treatment and transport from the emergency scene. At its nigh primitive, patients may be simply marked with coloured flagging tape or with marker pens. Pre-printed cards for this purpose are known as a triage tags.[10]

Tags [edit]

Many triage systems use triage tags with specific formats

Emergency Triage (E/T) Lights – peculiarly useful at dark or under adverse conditions

A triage tag is a prefabricated label placed on each patient that serves to accomplish several objectives:

  • identify the patient.
  • bear record of assessment findings.
  • place the priority of the patient's need for medical treatment and transport from the emergency scene.
  • track the patients' progress through the triage procedure.
  • identify additional hazards such as contamination.

Triage tags may take a multifariousness of forms. Some countries employ a nationally standardized triage tag,[11] while in other countries commercially available triage tags are used, and these will vary by jurisdictional choice.[12] The most commonly used commercial systems include the METTAG,[13] the SMARTTAG,[fourteen] Due east/T LIGHT tm[15] and the CRUCIFORM systems.[16] More than avant-garde tagging systems contain special markers to indicate whether or not patients take been contaminated by hazardous materials, and also tear off strips for tracking the motion of patients through the process. Some of these tracking systems are beginning to comprise the employ of handheld computers, and in some cases, bar lawmaking scanners.

Avant-garde triage [edit]

For classifications, see the specific department for that topic

In advanced triage, specially trained doctors, nurses and paramedics may make up one's mind that some seriously injured people should non receive advanced care considering they are unlikely to survive. It is used to divert deficient resources away from patients with little chance of survival in gild to increase the chances for others with higher likelihoods.

The use of avant-garde triage may go necessary when medical professionals decide that the medical resources available are not sufficient to treat all the people who demand aid. The handling being prioritized tin can include the fourth dimension spent on medical care, or drugs or other limited resources. This has happened in disasters such as terrorist attacks, mass shootings, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, tornadoes, thunderstorms, and track accidents. In these cases some percentage of patients will dice regardless of medical intendance because of the severity of their injuries. Others would alive if given firsthand medical care, merely would die without it.

In these extreme situations, any medical care given to people who volition die anyway tin be considered to be care withdrawn from others who might have survived (or perhaps suffered less severe disability from their injuries) had they been treated instead. It becomes the job of the disaster medical authorities to set up aside some victims as hopeless, to avoid trying to save ane life at the expense of several others.

If firsthand treatment is successful, the patient may improve (although this may be temporary) and this improvement may allow the patient to be categorized to a lower priority in the brusque term. Triage should be a continuous procedure and categories should be checked regularly to ensure that the priority remains right given the patient'due south condition. A trauma score is invariably taken when the victim first comes into hospital and subsequent trauma scores are taken to account for any changes in the victim'southward physiological parameters. If a record is maintained, the receiving infirmary doctor can see a trauma score time series from the start of the incident, which may allow definitive treatment earlier.

Opposite triage [edit]

Unremarkably, triage refers to prioritizing admission. A like process tin can be practical to discharging patients early when the medical system is stressed. This process has been called "contrary triage".[17] When a major wave of patients make it to a infirmary, such as immediately later a natural disaster, many hospital beds volition be already occupied by regular non-disquisitional patients. To conform a greater number of the new critical patients, the existing patients may exist triaged, and those who will not need immediate intendance can be discharged until the surge has dissipated, for example through the establishment of temporary medical facilities in the region.

Undertriage and overtriage [edit]

Undertriage is underestimating the severity of an affliction or injury. An example of this would be categorizing a Priority 1 (Firsthand) patient as a Priority 2 (Delayed) or Priority 3 (Minimal). Historically, adequate undertriage rates have been accounted 5% or less.

Overtriage is the overestimating of the severity of an illness or injury. An example of this would be categorizing a Priority three (Minimal) patient every bit a Priority 2 (Delayed) or Priority one (Immediate). Adequate overtriage rates accept been typically up to 50% in an effort to avert undertriage. Some studies suggest that overtriage is less likely to occur when triaging is performed by hospital medical teams, rather than paramedics or EMTs.[18]

Phone triage [edit]

In phone triage, conclusion makers over the telephone must effectively assess the patient's symptoms and provide directives based on the urgency. This should be washed in a timely manner while meeting standard guidelines in order to prevent symptoms from worsening.[19]

General concepts in triage-based treatment options and outcomes [edit]

Palliative care [edit]

For patients that take a poor prognosis and are expected to die regardless of the medical treatment available, palliative intendance such equally painkillers may exist given to ease suffering before they die.

Evacuation [edit]

In the field, triage sets priorities for evacuation or relocation to other care facilities.[20]

Alternative care facilities [edit]

Alternative intendance facilities are places that are gear up for the care of big numbers of patients, or are places that could be so set up. Examples include schools, sports stadiums, and large camps that can exist prepared and used for the care, feeding, and property of large numbers of victims of a mass casualty or other type of upshot.[21] Such improvised facilities are more often than not developed in cooperation with the local infirmary, which sees them as a strategy for creating surge chapters. While hospitals remain the preferred destination for all patients, during a mass casualty event such improvised facilities may be required in social club to divert low-acuity patients away from hospitals in gild to prevent the hospitals becoming overwhelmed.

Secondary (in-infirmary) triage [edit]

In avant-garde triage systems, secondary triage is typically implemented by emergency nurses, skilled paramedics, or battleground medical personnel within the emergency departments of hospitals during disasters, injured people are sorted into v categories.[22]

Some crippling injuries, even if not life-threatening, may be elevated in priority based on the available capabilities. During peacetime, most amputation injuries may be triaged "Ruddy" because surgical reattachment must take place inside minutes, even though in all probability the person volition not die without a thumb or hand.

Specific triage systems and methods [edit]

A triage sign at a Mexican emergency department indicating the waiting time for patients based on the severity of their condition

Applied applied triage [edit]

During the early stages of an incident, first responders may be overwhelmed by the scope of patients and injuries. Ane valuable technique is the Patient Assist Method (PAM). The responders quickly establish a casualty collection point (CCP) and advise, either by yelling or over a loudspeaker, that "anyone requiring aid should move to the selected area (CCP)". This does several things at once: it identifies patients that are not and then severely injured that they need immediate assistance, it physically clears the scene, and it provides possible assistants to the responders. Equally those who can move do so, the responders then ask, "anyone who withal needs assistance, yell out or heighten your hands"; this farther identifies patients who are responsive withal may be unable to motility. Now the responders can rapidly assess the remaining patients who are either expectant or are in need of immediate aid. From that point, the commencement responder is apace able to identify those in need of immediate attending while non being distracted or overwhelmed past the magnitude of the situation. Using this method assumes the power to hear. Deaf, partially deaf, or victims of a large smash injury may non be able to hear these instructions.

Scoring systems [edit]

The post-obit are examples of scoring systems used:

  • In Western Europe the Triage Revised Trauma Score (TRTS) is sometimes used and integrated into triage cards.[23]
  • The Injury Severity Score (ISS) is another example of a trauma scoring system. This assigns a score from 0 to 75 based on severity of injury to the human being trunk divided into three categories: A (face/neck/head), B(thorax/abdomen), C(extremities/external/skin). Each category is scored from 0 to 5 using the Abbreviated Injury Scale, from uninjured to critically injured, which is then squared and summed to create the ISS. A score of 6, for "unsurvivable", can also exist used for whatsoever of the three categories, and automatically sets the score to 75 regardless of other scores. Depending on the triage state of affairs, this may indicate either that the patient is a beginning priority for care, or that he or she volition non receive intendance owing to the need to conserve intendance for more likely survivors.

S.T.A.R.T. model [edit]

S.T.A.R.T. (Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment) is a simple triage organization that tin exist performed by lightly trained lay and emergency personnel in emergencies.[24] It is not intended to supersede or instruct medical personnel or techniques. Information technology has been taught to California emergency workers for utilize in earthquakes. It was adult at Hoag Hospital in Newport Beach, California for use past emergency services. It has been field-proven in mass prey incidents such as train wrecks and bus accidents, though it was adult by community emergency response teams (CERTs) and firefighters afterward earthquakes.

Triage separates the injured into iv groups:

  • The expectant who are beyond assistance
  • The injured who can be helped past firsthand transportation
  • The injured whose transport tin be delayed
  • Those with minor injuries who need help less urgently

Triage also sets priorities for evacuation and transport as follows:

  • Deceased are left where they fell. These include those who aren't breathing and repositioning their airway efforts were unsuccessful.
  • Immediate or Priority 1 (scarlet) evacuation past MEDEVAC if available or ambulance as they demand avant-garde medical care at one time or inside one hr. These people are in critical status and would die without immediate assistance.
  • Delayed or Priority ii (yellow) tin can take their medical evacuation delayed until all immediate people have been transported. These people are in stable status but require medical help.
  • Minor or Priority 3 (green) are not evacuated until all immediate and delayed persons take been evacuated. These volition non need advanced medical treat at least several hours. Proceed to re-triage in case their condition worsens. These people are able to walk and may only need bandages and antiseptic.

JumpSTART triage [edit]

The JumpSTART pediatric triage MCI triage tool is a variation of the S.T.A.R.T. model. Both systems are used to sort patients into categories at mass casualty incidents (MCIs). However, JumpSTART was designed specifically for triaging children in disaster settings. Though JumpSTART was developed for utilise in children from infancy to age viii, where age is non immediately obvious, it is used in whatever patient who appears to be a child (patients who appear to be young adults are triaged using START).[25]

Hospital systems [edit]

Inside the hospital system, the outset stage on inflow at the emergency department is assessment by the hospital triage nurse. This nurse volition evaluate the patient'south status, too as whatever changes, and will make up one's mind their priority for access to the emergency department and also for treatment.[26] One time emergency assessment and treatment are complete, the patient may need to exist referred to the hospital'due south internal triage system.

For a typical inpatient hospital triage system, a triage nurse or dr. volition either field requests for admission from the ER physician on patients needing admission or from physicians taking care of patients from other floors who can exist transferred because they no longer need that level of care (i.east. intensive intendance unit patient is stable for the medical floor). This helps patients flow more efficiently in the infirmary.

This triage position is often washed by a hospitalist. A major factor contributing to the triage conclusion is bachelor hospital bed space. The triage hospitalist must determine, in conjunction with a infirmary'southward "bed control" and albeit team, which beds are available for optimal utilization of resources in guild to provide condom care to all patients. A typical surgical team will accept their own organisation of triage for trauma and general surgery patients. This is too true for neurology and neurosurgical services. The overall goal of triage, in this arrangement, is to both make up one's mind if a patient is advisable for a given level of intendance and to ensure that hospital resources are utilized effectively.

Conventional classifications [edit]

In an advanced triage process injured people are sorted into categories. Conventionally there are v classifications with respective colors and numbers although this may vary by region.[22]

  • Blackness / Expectant: They are so severely injured that they will die of their injuries, maybe in hours or days (large-area burns, severe trauma, lethal radiations dose), or in life-threatening medical crisis that they are unlikely to survive given the care available (cardiac arrest, septic daze, severe head or chest wounds); their treatment is usually palliative, such every bit being given painkillers, to reduce suffering.
  • Red / Immediate: They crave immediate surgery or other life-saving intervention, and have first priority for surgical teams or transport to avant-garde facilities; they "cannot wait" simply are probable to survive with immediate handling.
  • Xanthous / Observation: Their condition is stable for the moment but requires watching by trained persons and frequent re-triage, volition need hospital care (and would receive firsthand priority intendance under "normal" circumstances).
  • Green / Wait (walking wounded): They will require a medico'due south care in several hours or days but not immediately, may wait for a number of hours or be told to go abode and come dorsum the adjacent twenty-four hours (broken bones without compound fractures, many soft tissue injuries).
  • White / Dismiss (walking wounded): They have small injuries; first assistance and home care are sufficient, a doctor's care is not required. Injuries are forth the lines of cuts and scrapes, or minor burns.

Australia and New Zealand [edit]

The Australasian Triage Scale (abbreviated ATS and formally known as the National Triage Scale) is a triage system that is implemented in both Australia and New Zealand.[27] [28] The scale has been in utilise since 1994.[29] The scale consists of 5 levels, with one being the well-nigh critical (resuscitation), and v being the least critical (nonurgent).[27]

Australasian Triage Calibration
Level Description Should be seen by provider within
1 Resuscitation 0 minutes
2 Emergency 10 minutes
3 Urgent 30 minutes
4 Semi-Urgent lx minutes
five Nonurgent 120 minutes

Canada [edit]

In the mid-1980s, The Victoria General Hospital, in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, introduced paramedic triage in its Emergency Department. Different all other centres in North America that employ doc and primarily nurse triage models, this hospital began the exercise of employing Primary Care level paramedics to perform triage upon entry to the Emergency Department. In 1997, following the amalgamation of 2 of the city's largest hospitals, the Emergency Department at the Victoria Full general airtight. The paramedic triage organisation was moved to the metropolis's only remaining adult emergency department, located at the New Halifax Infirmary. In 2006, a triage protocol on whom to exclude from treatment during a flu pandemic was written by a team of critical-care doctors at the bidding of the Ontario authorities.

For routine emergencies, many locales in Canada now employ the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) for all incoming patients.[30] The system categorizes patients past both injury and physiological findings, and ranks them by severity from i–5 (i beingness highest). The model is used by both paramedics and E/R nurses, and also for pre-arrival notifications in some cases. The model provides a mutual frame of reference for both nurses and paramedics, although the 2 groups do non always agree on scoring. It also provides a method, in some communities, for benchmarking the accuracy of pre-triage of calls using AMPDS (What pct of emergency calls accept render priorities of CTAS 1,ii,3, etc.) and these findings are reported as part of a municipal functioning benchmarking initiative in Ontario. Curiously enough the model is not currently used for mass casualty triage, and is replaced by the START protocol and METTAG triage tags.[31]

Canadian Triage and Vigil Scale (CTAS)
Level Clarification Should be seen by provider within
1 Resuscitation 0 minutes
2 Emergency 15 minutes
3 Urgent 30 minutes
iv Less Urgent 60 minutes
v Non Urgent 120 minutes

Republic of finland [edit]

Triage at an accident scene is performed by a paramedic or an emergency physician, using the four-level scale of Tin wait, Has to wait, Cannot wait, and Lost.

France [edit]

In France, the Prehospital triage in case of a disaster uses a four-level scale:

  • DCD: décédé (deceased), or urgence dépassée (beyond urgency)
  • UA: urgence absolue (absolute urgency)
  • UR: urgence relative (relative urgency)
  • UMP: urgence médico-psychologique (medical-psychological urgency) or impliqué (unsaid, i.e. lightly wounded or only psychologically shocked).

This triage is performed by a physician called médecin trieur (sorting medic).[32] This triage is unremarkably performed at the field hospital (PMA–poste médical avancé, i.e. forward medical post). The absolute urgencies are usually treated onsite (the PMA has an operating room) or evacuated to a hospital. The relative urgencies are merely placed under scout, waiting for an evacuation. The involved are addressed to another structure called the CUMP–Cellule d'urgence médico-psychologique (medical-psychological urgency jail cell); this is a resting zone, with food and perhaps temporary lodging, and a psychologist to take care of the brief reactive psychosis and avoid post-traumatic stress disorder.

In the emergency department of a hospital, the triage is performed by a medico chosen MAO–médecin d'accueil et d'orientation (reception and orientation md), and a nurse called IOA– infirmière d'organisation et d'accueil (organization and reception nurse). Some hospitals and SAMU organisations now use the "Cruciform" bill of fare referred to elsewhere.

France has also a Telephone Triage system for Medical Emergencies Phone Demands in its Samu Medical Regulation Centers through the 15 medical free national hot line. "Medical Doctor Regulator" decides what is to be the virtually efficient solution = Emergency Telemedecine or dispatch of an Ambulance, a General Practitioner or a Physician+ Nurse + Ambulance Human being, Hospital based MICU (Mobile Intensive Care Unit).

Federal republic of germany [edit]

Preliminary assessment of injuries is usually done by the commencement ambulance crew on scene, with this role being assumed by the first physician arriving at the scene. Equally a rule, in that location will be no cardiopulmonary resuscitation, so patients who do not breathe on their own or develop circulation later their airways are cleared will exist tagged "deceased". Besides, not every major injury automatically qualifies for a carmine tag. A patient with a traumatic amputation of the forearm might but be tagged yellow, have the bleeding stopped, and so exist sent to a hospital when possible. After the preliminary assessment, a more specific and definite triage will follow, equally soon as patients are brought to a field treatment facility. There, they volition be disrobed and fully examined by an emergency physician. This will take approximately 90 seconds per patient.[33]

The German language triage system also uses four, sometimes five colour codes to denote the urgency of handling.[34] Typically, every ambulance is equipped with a folder or bag with coloured ribbons or triage tags. The urgency is denoted as follows:

Category Meaning Consequences Examples
T1 (I) Acute danger for life Immediate treatment, ship equally soon as possible Arterial lesions, internal haemorrhage, major amputations
T2 (II) Astringent injury Constant observation and rapid handling, ship equally soon as practical Minor amputations, flesh wounds, fractures and dislocations
T3 (III) Minor injury or no injury Treatment when practical, transport and/or discharge when possible Small-scale lacerations, sprains, abrasions
T4 (IV) No or pocket-size chance of survival Observation and if possible administration of analgesics Severe injuries, uncompensated claret loss, negative neurological assessment
Deceased Drove and guarding of bodies, identification when possible Injuries not uniform with life, no spontaneous animate afterward clearing of airway, downgraded from T1-4

Hong Kong [edit]

In Hong Kong, triage in Accident & Emergency Departments is performed past experienced registered nurses, patients are divided into five triage categories: Critical, Emergency, Urgent, Semi-urgent and Non-urgent.[35]

Japan [edit]

In Nihon, the triage system is mainly used past wellness professionals. The categories of triage, in respective color codes, are:

  •  Category I : Used for viable victims with potentially life-threatening conditions.
  •  Category Two : Used for victims with non-life-threatening injuries, but who urgently require handling.
  •  Category III : Used for victims with small-scale injuries that do not crave ambulance transport.
  •  Category 0 : Used for victims who are expressionless, or whose injuries make survival unlikely.

Singapore [edit]

All public hospitals in Singapore employ the Patient Acuity Category Scale (PACS) to triage patient in Emergency Departement. PACS is a symptom-based differential diagnosis approach that triages patients according to their presenting complaints and objective assessments such equally vital signs and Glasgow Coma Scale, allowing acute patients to be identified chop-chop for treatment. PACS classifies patients into four main categories: P1, P2, P3, and P4.[36]

Patient Vigil Category Calibration
Category (Priority Level) Category Name Description Case
P1 Critically sick and requires resuscitation Country of cardiovascular collapse or in imminent danger of plummet and require immediate medical attention. Multiple major trauma, head injury with loss of consciousness, shortness of breath, unconsciousness from any cause
P2 Major emergency unable to walk and are in some form of distress, appear stable on initial test, and are non in imminent danger of collapse, requires very early attending Chest pain, major limb fractures, major joint dislocations, spinal cord injury, trunk injury with stable vital signs
P3 Minor emergency able to walk, have mild to moderate symptoms and require early treatment All sprains, mild constant abdominal pain, fever with cough for several days, insect stings or beast bites (not in severe distress), superficial injuries with or without mild bleeding, pocket-sized caput injury (alert, no vomiting), foreign object in ear, nose, or pharynx, urinary tract infections, headaches.
P4 Nonemergency Sometime injury or status that has been nowadays for a long fourth dimension. Chronic lower dorsum pain, high cholesterol, acne.

Spain [edit]

In Kingdom of spain, there are two models which are the nigh mutual establish in hospitals effectually the state:

  • The Sistema Estructurado de Triaje (Ready), which is an adaptation of the Model Andorrà de Triatge (MAT). The system uses 650 reasons for medical appointment in 32 symptomatic categories, that together with some patient data and basic exploratory information, classifies the emergency within v levels of urgency.
  • The "Manchester", based on the system with the same name in the U.k.,[37] use 51 reasons for consultation. Through some yes/no questions, addressed in a diagram, it classifies the emergency in 5 severities.

Some autonomous communities in Spain, like Navarre and the Valencian Community, have created their ain systems for the community hospitals.

United Kingdom [edit]

In the UK, the commonly used triage organization is the Smart Incident Command System,[38] taught on the MIMMS (Major Incident Medical Management (and) Back up) training programme.[39] The Britain Armed Forces use this organisation on operations. This grades casualties from Priority 1 (needs immediate treatment) to Priority 3 (can expect for delayed treatment). There is an additional Priority 4 (expectant, probable to dice even with treatment) but the employ of this category requires senior medical say-so.

In the UK and Europe, the triage process used is sometimes similar to that of the United States (run into below), but the categories are different:[40]

  •  Dead – patients who have a trauma score of 0 to 2 and are beyond aid
  •  Priority 1 – patients who have a trauma score of three to x (RTS) and demand immediate attention
  •  Priority ii – patients who accept a trauma score of x or 11 and can wait for a brusque time earlier send to definitive medical attention
  •  Priority 3 – patients who have a trauma score of 12 (maximum score) and tin can exist delayed earlier transport from the scene

U.s. [edit]

Triage in a multi-scale destruction, disaster, catastrophic, casualty result, such as post-obit a tornado or an explosion in a populated area, kickoff responders follow a similar triage category scale every bit the United states of america war machine. The civilian medical industry uses a similar system for triage. Normally medical personnel aren't immediately available on scene. First responders are usually the outset to get in on scene. They could be police, fire rescue, paramedics, or community individuals with disaster training (CERT certified). They are trained to perform beginning aid, basic life saving and rescue techniques while performing the greatest good, for the greatest number of people. They will rapidly classify victims and sort them into 4 categories, treating quickly as they go. This system is intended to apace identify and allocate victims for arriving transport or advanced intendance medical personnel such as doctors and nurses. The local National Baby-sit and other armed services units responding would be using the military system of triage rather than noncombatant. The triage categories are general and the names may vary by region of the nation:

  •  Minimal : Known equally walking wounded or uninjured, greenish classified individuals typically require very little medical aid if any. Their injuries are minor, unremarkably scrapes, cuts, and bruising with normal capillary refill. They can walk, function freely without assistance, are cognizant, and able to answer accurately to questioning. These individuals will sometimes be asked to assist the responder with transport and applying directly aid to other victims. They will afterwards be staged in an surface area to be checked more than thoroughly later.
  •  Injured - Moderate : Yellow individuals require medical attention simply information technology is not needed immediately. Individuals in this category may accept cuts, bruises, lacerations, some confusion, minor fractures, and a capillary refill between 4 and seven seconds (sometimes longer in cold environments). Field dressing of the wounds is usually applied quickly. Fractures are stabilized and individuals listed as light-green will be asked to assist with collection of yellow individuals for ship to the medical staging area.
  •  Immediate - Severe : Cherry-red requires immediate medical attention and will non survive if not seen soon. A person with a severe caput injury, multiple fractures to the skeletal system, fractures in fragile areas such equally the spinal cord, massive confusion, incohesive, unable to answer simple questions, unresponsive but with vital signs, arterial bleeding, internal bleeding, or capillary refill exceeding vii seconds is classified ruby-red. Immediate assist is practical to cease external arterial bleeding and airways are adjusted to ensure un-obstruction every bit they are carefully moved to a medical staging area, usually with the aid of those marked dark-green or unable to provide medical assistance.
  •  Presumed Deceased : Individuals listed as blackness have died. The person'southward pulse and breathing is checked to confirm no vitals present. In low-scale disaster with few victims involved, firsthand CPR is started in attempt to revive the vital signs. In larger events with more victims, the head is positioned to open up the airway, the body is rolled onto its side and the responder will move on to the next victim. The positioning is done and so if the body's vitals return, vomiting volition non be every bit likely to asphyxiate the victim. The bodies volition non exist collected until all surviving individuals have been removed from the immediate disaster surface area. In that location will be a trunk collection staging area set up away from any medical staging areas. Usually this will begin the recovery stage.

United States armed forces [edit]

A battlefield situation, however, requires medics and corpsmen to rank casualties for precedence in MEDEVAC or CASEVAC. The casualties are so transported to a college level of care, either a Forward Surgical Team or Combat Support Infirmary and re-triaged past a nurse or doctor. In a gainsay state of affairs, the triage system is based solely on resources and ability to save the maximum number of lives within the means of the infirmary supplies and personnel.

The triage categories (with respective color codes), in precedence, are:

  •  Immediate : The prey requires immediate medical attention and will not survive if non treated soon. Any compromise to the casualty'south respiration, hemorrhage control, or shock control could be fatal.
  •  Delayed : The casualty requires medical attention inside 6 hours. Injuries are potentially life-threatening, simply can wait until the Firsthand casualties are stabilized and evacuated.
  •  Minimal : "Walking wounded," the casualty requires medical attention when all higher priority patients accept been evacuated, and may not require stabilization or monitoring.
  •  Expectant : The casualty is expected not to attain higher medical support alive without compromising the treatment of higher priority patients. Intendance should non be abandoned, spare any remaining time and resource later on Immediate and Delayed patients have been treated.[41]

Afterwards, casualties are given an evacuation priority based on demand:

  • Urgent: evacuation is required inside 2 hours to salve life or limb.
  • Priority: evacuation is necessary within four hours or the prey volition deteriorate to "Urgent".
  • Routine: evacuate within 24 hours to consummate treatment.

In a "naval gainsay situation", the triage officer must counterbalance the tactical situation with supplies on hand and the realistic capacity of the medical personnel. This procedure can exist e'er-irresolute, dependent upon the situation and must attempt to practise the maximum good for the maximum number of casualties.[42]

Field assessments are made past 2 methods: chief survey (used to detect & treat life-threatening injuries) and secondary survey (used to treat not-life-threatening injuries) with the post-obit categories:

  • Form I: Patients who require minor treatment and tin return to duty in a short menstruum of fourth dimension.
  • Form II: Patients whose injuries require immediate life sustaining measures.
  • Grade III: Patients for whom definitive handling tin can be delayed without loss of life or limb.
  • Class 4: Patients requiring such extensive care across medical personnel capability and time.

Limitations of current practices [edit]

Notions of mass casualty triage as an efficient rationing process of determining priority based upon injury severity are not supported by enquiry, evaluation and testing of electric current triage practices, which lack scientific and methodological bases. START and START-like (Showtime) triage that use color-coded categories to prioritize provide poor assessments of injury severity and and then leave it to providers to subjectively order and allocate resources within flawed categories.[43] Some of these limitations include:

  • defective the clear goal of maximizing the number of lives saved, too as the focus, pattern and objective methodology to achieve that goal (a protocol of taking the worst Immediate – everyman chances for survival – first can be statistically invalid and dangerous)[43] [44]
  • using trauma measures that are problematic (east.g., capillary refill)[44] and grouping into broad color-coded categories that are not in accordance with injury severities, medical evidence and needs. Categories do not differentiate among injury severities and survival probabilities, and are invalid based on categorical definitions and evacuation priorities
  • ordering (prioritization) and allocating resource subjectively within Firsthand and Delayed categories, which are neither reproducible nor scalable, with little take a chance of existence optimal[43]
  • not considering/addressing size of incident, resources, and injury severities and prioritization inside its categories[43] [44] – e.1000., protocol does non change whether 3, thirty or 3,000 casualties require its use, and regardless of available resource to be rationed
  • non considering differences in injury severities and survival probabilities betwixt types of trauma (blunt versus penetrating, etc.) and ages
  • resulting in inconsistent tagging and prioritizing/ordering of casualties and substantial overtriage

Inquiry indicates at that place are broad ranges and overlaps of survival probabilities of the Immediate and Delayed categories, and other Beginning limitations. The same physiologic measures can accept markedly unlike survival probabilities for blunt and penetrating injuries. For example, a START Delayed (second priority) can accept a survival probability of 63% for blunt trauma and a survival probability of 32% for penetrating trauma with the same physiological measures – both with expected rapid deterioration, while a Outset Immediate (first priority) can accept survival probabilities that extend to in a higher place 95% with expected ho-hum deterioration. Age categories exacerbate this. For example, a geriatric patient with a penetrating injury in the Delayed category can have an eight% survival probability, and a pediatric patient in the Immediate category can accept a 98% survival probability. Issues with the other Commencement categories have also been noted.[44] In this context, color-coded tagging accuracy metrics are not scientifically meaningful.

Poor assessments, invalid categories, no objective methodology and tools for prioritizing casualties and allocating resources, and a protocol of worst first triage provide some challenges for emergency and disaster preparedness and response. These are clear obstacles for efficient triage and resource rationing, for maximizing savings of lives, for best practices and National Incident Management System (NIMS) compatibilities,[45] [46] [47] and for effective response planning and training.

Inefficient triage likewise provides challenges in containing health care costs and waste. Field triage is based upon the notion of up to 50% overtriage as existence acceptable. At that place have been no toll-do good analyses of the costs and mitigation of triage inefficiencies embedded in the healthcare system. Such analyses are often required for healthcare grants funded by taxpayers, and represent normal applied science and management science practice. These inefficiencies relate to the following cost areas:

  • tremendous investment in fourth dimension and money since 9/11 to develop and improve responders' triage skills[44]
  • cited benefits from standardization of triage methodology, reproducibility and interoperability,[44] and NIMS compatibilities
  • avoided capital costs for taxpayer investment in additional EMS and trauma infrastructure[48]
  • wasteful daily resource utilization and increased operating costs from acceptance of substantial levels of overtriage
  • prescribed values of a statistical life[49] and estimated savings in human lives that could reasonably exist expected using show-based triage practices
  • ongoing functioning improvements[45] that could reasonably be expected from a more objective optimization-based triage system and practices

Upstanding considerations [edit]

Considering handling is intentionally delayed or withheld from individuals under this system, triage has ethical implications that complicate the controlling process. Individuals involved in triage must have a comprehensive view of the process to ensure allegiance, veracity, justice, autonomy, and beneficence are safeguarded.[50]

Upstanding implications vary between different settings and the type of triage system employed, culminating in no single aureate-standard approach to triage. It is advised for emergency departments to preemptively plan strategies in attempts to mitigate the emotional burden on these triage responders.[51] While doing so, standards of intendance must exist maintained to preserve the safety of both patients and providers.

There is widespread agreement among ethicists that, in do, during the COVID-19 pandemic triage should prioritize "those who have the best chance of surviving" and follow guidelines with strict criteria that consider both short-term and long-term survivability.[52] Likewise, the triage of other health services has been adjusted during the pandemic to limit resource strain on hospitals.

Commonsensical approach and critique [edit]

Nether the utilitarian model, triage works to maximize the survival outcomes of the nigh people possible. This arroyo implies that some individuals may likely endure or perish in order for the bulk to survive. Triage officers must allocate express resources and weigh an private'south needs with the population as a whole.

Some ethicists argue the commonsensical approach to triage is not an impartial mechanism, only rather a partial one that fails to address the social weather that prevent optimal outcomes in marginalized communities, rendering information technology a practical simply inadequate means of distributing health resources.[53]

Special population groups [edit]

There is wide discussion regarding how VIPs and celebrities should be cared for in the emergency department. It is mostly argued that giving special considerations or deviating from the standard medical protocol for VIPs or celebrities is unethical due to the cost of others. However, others argue that it may be morally justifiable every bit long equally their treatment does not hinder the needs of others later assessing overall fairness, quality of intendance, privacy, and other upstanding implications.[54]

Proposed frameworks in conflict [edit]

A diversity of logistical challenges complicate the triage and ultimate provision of intendance in disharmonize situations. Humanitarian actors acknowledge challenges like disruptions in nutrient and medical supply chains, lack of suitable facilities, and existence of policies that prohibit administration of care to certain communities and populations equally elements that straight impede the successful commitment of care.[55] The logistical realities of humanitarian emergencies and conflict situations threatens the bioethical principle of beneficence, the obligation to act for the benefit of others.[56]

Technical challenges of triage in conflict settings [edit]

To address the ethical concerns that underpin triage in conflict situations and humanitarian crises, new triage frameworks and classification systems take been suggested that specifically aim to uphold human rights. Scholars have argued that new frameworks must prioritize informed consent and rely on established medical criteria merely in order to respect the man rights considerations set up along by the Geneva Convention of 1864 and the Universal Annunciation of Human Rights,[57] but no comprehensive triage model has been adopted by international bodies.

Run across also [edit]

  • Gainsay stress reaction
  • Glasgow blackout scale
  • Hospital emergency codes
  • Mass decontamination
  • Remote patient monitoring
  • Wilderness starting time aid

References [edit]

  1. ^ "Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary". Retrieved 2008-12-05 .
  2. ^ Luiz, Thomas (2010). Medizinische Gefahrenabwehr: Katastrophenmedizin und Krisenmanagement im Bevölkerungsschutz (in German). Elsevier,Urban&FischerVerlag. p. 56. ISBN978-3-437-24590-nine . Retrieved 29 January 2022.
  3. ^ Cueni, Claude (27 November 2020). "Triage in Zeiten der Corona-Pandemie – Claude Cueni". Blick (in Swiss Loftier High german). Kirche und Leben. Retrieved 29 Jan 2022.
  4. ^ P.Northward. Skandalakis, P. Lainas, J.Eastward. Skandalakis, P. Mirilas, "'To afford the wounded speedy assistance': Dominique Jean Larrey and Napoleon", Globe Periodical of Surgery xxx:viii:1392-9 (August 2006)
  5. ^ Joost J. van Middendorp, Gonzalo M. Sanchez, Alwyn L. Burridge, "The Edwin Smith papyrus: a clinical reappraisal of the oldest known document on spinal injuries", European Spine Journal 19:11:1815-1823 (November 2010)
  6. ^ Iserson KV, Moskop JC (March 2007). "Triage in medicine, part I: Concept, history, and types". Annals of Emergency Medicine. 49 (3): 275–81. doi:ten.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.05.019. PMID 17141139.
  7. ^ Chipman M, Hackley BE, Spencer TS (February 1980). "Triage of mass casualties: concepts for coping with mixed battlefield injuries". Mil Med. 145 (2): 99–100. doi:ten.1093/milmed/145.ii.99. PMID 6768037.
  8. ^ "Digital tools and virtual intendance in emergency services".
  9. ^ Buchard, Albert; et al. (2020). "Learning medical triage from clinicians using Deep Q-Learning". arXiv:2003.12828 [cs.AI].
  10. ^ "Medical Triage: Code Tags and Triage Terminology".
  11. ^ Idoguchi Thou, Mizobata Y, et al. (2006). "Usefulness of Our Proposed Format of Triage Tag". Journal of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. 17 (5): 183–91. doi:10.3893/jjaam.17.183.
  12. ^ Nocera A (Winter 2000). "Australian disaster triage: a colour maze in the Tower of Boom-boom" (PDF). Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 69 (8): 35–twoscore. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01643.10. PMID 10472919. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-03-14. Retrieved 2010-04-12 .
  13. ^ "METTAG Corporate website". Archived from the original on 2019-03-28. Retrieved 2008-12-05 .
  14. ^ "Smart Triage Tag, (TSG Associates Corporate website". Archived from the original on 2008-11-twenty. Retrieved 2008-12-05 .
  15. ^ Beidel, Eric (December 2010). "Military Medics, Start Responders Guided By Simple Low-cal". nationaldefensemagazine.org. Archived from the original on 2011-01-31. Retrieved 2011-02-03 .
  16. ^ Lakha, Raj; Tony Moore (2006). Tolley'due south handbook of disaster and emergency management. Amsterdam: Elsevier. ISBN978-0-7506-6990-0.
  17. ^ Gabor D. Kelen; Melissa Fifty. McCarthy; Chadd 1000. Kraus; Ru Ding; Edbert B. Hsu; Guohua Li; Judy B. Shahan; James J. Scheulen; Gary B. Light-green (2009). "Creation of Surge Capacity by Early Belch of Hospitalized Patients at Low Gamble for Untoward Events". Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness: S1–S7.
  18. ^ Turegano-Fuentes F, Perez-Diaz D, et al. (2008). "Overall Assessment of the Response to Terrorist Bombings in Trains, Madrid, 11 March 2004". European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 34 (5): 433–41. doi:10.1007/s00068-008-8805-2. PMID 26815987. S2CID 13657747.
  19. ^ Wheeler, Sheila Q.; Greenberg, Mary E.; Mahlmeister, Laura; Wolfe, Nicole (March 10, 2015). "Condom of Clinical and Non-Clinical Decision Makers in Telephone Triage: A Narrative Review". Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 21 (6): 305–322. doi:10.1177/1357633x15571650. PMID 25761468. S2CID 23049229.
  20. ^ "Lawmaking Orange Plan (Assiniboine Regional Wellness Potency)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on December 5, 2008. Retrieved 2008-12-05 .
  21. ^ "Chapter 8: Clinical and Public Health Systems Problems Arising from the Outbreak of Sars in Toronto (Public Health Agency of Canada website)". 2004-11-08. Archived from the original on 2008-12-06. Retrieved 2008-12-05 .
  22. ^ a b Mehta S (April 2006). "Disaster and mass casualty management in a hospital: How well are we prepared?" (PDF). J Postgrad Med. 52 (2): 89–90. PMID 16679668.
  23. ^ "The Field Triage (European Trauma Course)". Archived from the original on 2008-12-07. Retrieved 2008-12-02 .
  24. ^ Burstein, Jonathan L.; Hogan, David (2007). Disaster medicine . Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 25. ISBN978-0-7817-6262-five.
  25. ^ "JumpSTART Pediatric Triage Algorithm". Chemical Hazards Emergency Medical Management. The states Department of Health and Human Services. June 25, 2011. Archived from the original on March 26, 2016. Retrieved February 9, 2016.
  26. ^ Visser, L.; Montejano, A.; Grossman, Five. (2015). Fast Facts for the Triage Nurse. New York Urban center: Springer Publishers. ISBN978-0-8261-2265-0.
  27. ^ a b Aacharya RP, Gastmans C, Denier Y (2011). "Emergency department triage: an ethical assay". BMC Emergency Medicine. 11: 16. doi:10.1186/1471-227X-eleven-16. PMC3199257. PMID 21982119.
  28. ^ "Policy on the Australasian Triage Scale" (PDF). Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. November 2000. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-22. Retrieved 2011-12-x .
  29. ^ Christ M, Grossmann F, Winter D, Bingisser R, Platz East (December 2010). "Modern triage in the emergency section". Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 107 (50): 892–98. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2010.0892. PMC3021905. PMID 21246025.
  30. ^ "Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians website)". Archived from the original on 2008-12-10. Retrieved 2008-12-02 .
  31. ^ "METTAG Triage Tags". Archived from the original on 2019-03-28. Retrieved 2008-12-02 .
  32. ^ David L. Hoyt; Wilson, William J.; Grande, Christopher Grand. (2007). Trauma. Informa Healthcare. ISBN978-0-8247-2919-6.
  33. ^ "Telemedical back up of emergency prehospital care in mass casualty incidents" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-xix. Retrieved 2008-12-04 .
  34. ^ Brook A, Bayeff-Filloff M, Bischoff K, Schneider BM (November 2002). "[Analysis of the incidence and causes of mass casualty events in a southern Germany medical rescue area]". Unfallchirurg (in High german). 105 (11): 968–73. doi:10.1007/s00113-002-0516-two. PMID 12402122. S2CID 37588729.
  35. ^ "Guide to Blow & Emergency (A&E) Service". Hospital Potency. Archived from the original on 2012-09-08. Retrieved 2012-11-29 .
  36. ^ Fong, Ru Ying; Glen, Wee Sern Sim; Jamil, Ahmad Khairil Mohamed; Tam, Wilson Wai San; Kowitlawakul, Yanika (2018). "Comparison of the Emergency Severity Index versus the Patient Acuity Category Scale in an emergency setting". International Emergency Nursing. 41: thirteen–18. doi:ten.1016/j.ienj.2018.05.001. PMID 29887281. S2CID 47014585.
  37. ^ Azeredo, Thereza Raquel Machado; Guedes, Helisamara Mota; Rebelo De Almeida, Ricardo Alexandre; Chianca, Tânia Couto Machado; Martins, José Carlos Amado (April 2015). "Efficacy of the Manchester Triage System: a systematic review". International Emergency Nursing. 23 (2): 47–52. doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2014.06.001. PMID 25087059.
  38. ^ "TSGassociates.co.uk". Archived from the original on 2006-05-xix. Retrieved 2006-04-03 .
  39. ^ "Major Incident Medical Management and Back up Form" (PDF) . Retrieved 2008-12-04 .
  40. ^ Jill Windle; Manchester Triage Group Staff; Mackway-Jones, Kevin; Marsden, Janet (2006). Emergency triage. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Pub. ISBN978-0-7279-1542-ix.
  41. ^ "US Army Written report Guide". Archived from the original on 2008-09-14. Retrieved 2008-12-04 .
  42. ^ Koehler RH, Smith RS, Bacaner T (August 1994). "Triage of American gainsay casualties: the need for change". Mil Med. 159 (8): 541–47. doi:x.1093/milmed/159.8.541. PMID 7824145.
  43. ^ a b c d Lindsey, J. New Triage Method Considers Available Resource. JEMS July 2005 pp. 92–93. http://saccotriage.com/pdf/JEMS_7_05_New_Triage_v2.pdf Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine
  44. ^ a b c d e f Learner, EB, Schwartz, RB, and Coule, PL et al. "Mass Casualty Triage: An Evaluation of the Data and Development of a Proposed National Guideline." Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness Vol. 2 September 2008 pp. 525–34. Archived 2019-03-22 at the Wayback Machine
  45. ^ a b United states Department of Homeland Security. National Incident Direction Organization. December 2008. http://www.fema.gov/national-incident-management-organization
  46. ^ Villani, D. Director, Department of Public Safety, Okaloosa County, Florida. letter to FEMA request if START and STM are NIMS compatible. September 2007. http://saccotriage.com/pdf/Florida_official_letter_toFEMA.pdf Archived 2016-03-03 at the Wayback Machine
  47. ^ Fluman, A. FEMA Alphabetic character to Dino Villani, onetime State of Florida European monetary system Managing director, summarizing FEMA Evaluation and Testing Program of STM NIMS compatibilities and operational effectiveness and suitability. December 2007. http://saccotriage.com/pdf/FEMAresponseNIMS.pdf Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine
  48. ^ Dark-brown, D. "Crunch Seen in Nation's ER Care." The Washington Postal service June 2006. https://www.washingtonpost.com
  49. ^ Appelbaum, B. "Every bit U.S. Agencies Put More than Value on a Life, Businesses Fret" The New York Times. Feb 2011. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/business/economy/17regulation.html
  50. ^ Repine, Thomas B., Philip Lisagor, and David J. Cohen. "The dynamics and ethics of triage: rationing care in hard times." Military Medicine 170.six (2005): 505-509.
  51. ^ Hick, John L.; Hanfling, Dan; Cantrill, Stephen V. (March 2012). "Allocating Deficient Resources in Disasters: Emergency Department Principles". Annals of Emergency Medicine. 59 (3): 177–187. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.06.012. ISSN 0196-0644. PMID 21855170.
  52. ^ Joebges, S., & Biller-Andorno, N. Joebges, Susanne; Biller-Andorno, Nikola (May 6, 2020). "Ideals guidelines on COVID-xix triage-an emerging international consensus". Critical Care. 24 (1): 201. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-02927-1. PMC7202791. PMID 32375855.
  53. ^ Okorie, N. (2019). Partiality, Impartiality and the Ethics of Triage. Developing World Bioethics, xix(2), 76-85.
  54. ^ Jagoda, Andy; McCarthy, James J.; Malik, Sanjeev; Geiderman, Joel Martin (2018-ten-01). "The care of VIPs in the emergency section: Triage, treatment and ethics". The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 36 (10): 1881–1885. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2018.07.009. ISSN 0735-6757. PMID 30238911. S2CID 52310367. [ permanent expressionless link ]
  55. ^ Broussard, Grant, et al. "Challenges to upstanding obligations and humanitarian principles in conflict settings: a systematic review." Journal of International Humanitarian Action 4.i (2019): 15.
  56. ^ Broussard, Grant; Rubenstein, Leonard S.; Robinson, Courtland; Maziak, Wasim; Gilbert, Sappho Z.; DeCamp, Matthew (2019-09-05). "Challenges to ethical obligations and humanitarian principles in disharmonize settings: a systematic review". Journal of International Humanitarian Activeness. 4 (1): 15. doi:x.1186/s41018-019-0063-x. ISSN 2364-3404. S2CID 201838587.
  57. ^ Domres, B., Koch, One thousand., Manger, A., & Becker, H. D. (2001). Ethics and Triage. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 16(1), 53-58.

matthiesthandsoll.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triage

0 Response to "when performing triage, what classification should be given to a victim with minor injuries?"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel